For Healthcare Professionals Outside the US
KISQALI is indicated for the treatment of women with hormone receptor (HR)–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)—negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant as initial endocrine-based therapy, or in women who have received prior endocrine therapy. In pre‑ or perimenopausal women, the endocrine therapy should be combined with a luteinizing hormone‑releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist.

It looks like you are using an older version of Internet Explorer which is not supported. We advise that you update your browser to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, or consider using other browsers such as Chrome, Firefox or Safari.

 

Experts present data

Adding to the growing body of evidence for KISQALI

line

Ribociclib in patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer and resistance to prior endocrine therapy in the MONALEESA-3 and -7 trials
Hurvitz SA, Lee SC, Jerusalem G, et al.

Sara Hurvitz, MD, shares highlights

G-RIB-1236184

Summary

  • Analyses of the MONALEESA-3 and MONALEESA-7 trials examined overall survival benefits in patients with endocrine resistance—a major clinical challenge in patients with HR+ advanced breast cancer1
  • ET resistance was defined as progression within the first 6 months of first-line ET for aBC while on ET or as relapse within the first 2 years of (neo)adjuvant ET1
  • A 41% and 30% reduction in the risk of death was observedin premenopausal and postmenopausal patients, respectively1
    • Survival benefits in the ET-resistant population were consistent with those in the overall study populations1

Results
OS in endocrine therapy–
resistant patients1

OS-in-endocrine-therapy-resistant-patients

KISQALI—the only CDK4/6 inhibitor with improved quality of life across 3 pivotal Phase III trials2-4

Pooled analysis of patient-reported quality of life in the MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 trials of ribociclib plus endocrine therapy to treat hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer
Fasching PA, Bardia A, Nusch A, et al.

Peter Fasching, MD, shares highlights

G-RIB-1236184

Summary

  • Quality of life (QoL) was assessed for patients receiving initial treatment in MONALEESA-3, patients receiving KISQALI or placebo with an aromatase inhibitor in MONALEESA-7, and all patients in MONALEESA-22
  • EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires were used to evaluate outcomes including global health status, pain, and emotional functioning2
  • Patient-reported outcomes provide important guidance for clinical decision making. The ESMO-MCBS includes QoL impact as an important consideration for grading clinical benefit4

KISQALI + ET as first-line therapy improved quality of life in pre- and postmenopausal patients with aBC2-4

KISQALI-ET-in-as-first-line-therapy
  • TTD in pain and in emotional and social functioning was also delayed vs the control arm
  • No marked differences in deterioration of quality of life due to fatigue and physical functioning vs the control arm

Hear experts discuss QoL with KISQALI 
Download the presentation

Dose reductions with KISQALI do not compromise overall survival5

Impact of ribociclib dose reduction on overall survival in patients with HR+/HER2– advanced breast cancer in MONALEESA-3 and -7
De Laurentiis M, de la Cruz-Merino L , Hart L, et al.

Michelino De Laurentiis, MD, shares highlights

G-RIB-1236184

Summary

  • An analysis of the MONALEESA-3 and MONALEESA-7 clinical trials assessed the impact of dose reductions with KISQALI on overall survival5
  • Patients who require a dose reduction, for adverse event management or other reasons, can continue to receive survival benefits with KISQALI5
  • OS benefit was maintained regardless of ribociclib dose reduction and was consistent with the overall population based on the hazard ratios derived from time-dependent Cox models6

Overall survival by dose reduction and relative dose intensity5

overall-survival-by-dose-reduction-and-relative-dose-intensity
  • Across both trials, ~41% of patients received ≥1 dose reduction5
  • Relative dose intensity (RDI) was also assessed to account for reduction or interruption5

See the safety profile for KISQALI
View trial designs for MONALEESA-3 and MONALEESA-7
Download the poster

Unanchored matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison with KISQALI + ET and palbociclib + ET in first-line postmenopausal patients7

Comparative effectiveness of ribociclib plus fulvestrant versus palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line treatment of HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer assessed by matching-adjusted indirect comparison
Fasching PA, Delea TE, Lu Y-S, et al.

Peter Fasching, MD, shares highlights

G-RIB-1236184

Summary

  • MONALEESA-3 and PALOMA-1 are the only CDK4/6 inhibitor trials to report first-line OS results in postmenopausal patients
  • Because it is difficult to compare two separate clinical trials directly, a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) provides an opportunity to indirectly compare them by adjusting for differences in patient populations8
  • It is important to understand that these types of analyses cannot provide the same type of confirmation as a clinical trial, so these results are only meant to provide an idea of the differences between the two treatments when a clinical trial comparing the two is unavailable8
  • Using an MAIC to account for differences in the patient populations, this analysis leveraged data from patients receiving first-line treatment with KISQALI + fulvestrant or placebo + fulvestrant in MONALEESA-3 and palbociclib + letrozole or placebo + letrozole in PALOMA-18
  • This analysis supported the first-line use of KISQALI8
    • Median OS was significantly longer with KISQALI + fulvestrant vs palbociclib + letrozole in the unweighted and weighted analyses8
  • While MAIC analyses provide an estimate for differences between two trials in the absence of head-to-head clinical studies, they do not serve as a replacement for a clinical trial to confirm or refute a true difference8

Analysis Methods

  • An unanchored MAIC analyzing PFS and OS was conducted using individual patient data from those receiving KISQALI + fulvestrant or placebo + fulvestrant first line in the phase III MONALEESA-3 trial and aggregated data from the phase II PALOMA-1 trial8
    • To match patients in PALOMA-1, only patients with no prior ET for advanced disease and no (neo)adjuvant letrozole ≤12 months before enrollment in MONALEESA-3 were included8
  • 329 patients in the KISQALI arm and 178 patients from the control arm of MONALEESA-3 were reweighted to match average baseline characteristics of 84 patients in the palbociclib arm and 81 patients from the control arm of PALOMA-18
    • After weighting, patients were well balanced across characteristics8
  • PFS and OS were compared using Kaplan-Meier estimators and Cox regressions8

Overall Survival for KISQALI + Fulvestrant vs Palbociclib + Letrozole

Fasching-(ESMO-2020-Poster-Final)-MAIC_9.3.20.png

The KM curve here was based on digitized data that only reach 50.9% for the PAL + LET arm; as such, the median was not reached in this analysis and the OS for this arm may be slightly overestimated, meaning this analysis may be conservative. 

KM-curve

 Median value from published data.7

View unprecedented survival with KISQALI
Download the presentation

aBC, advanced breast cancer; AI, aromatase inhibitor; CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; ESMO-MCBS, European Society for Medical Oncology magnitude of clinical benefit scale; ET, endocrine therapy; FUL, fulvestrant;  HR, hazard ratio; KM, Kaplan-Meier; LET, letrozole; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival; PAL, palbociclib; PFS, progression-free survival; QLC-C30, EORTC quality of life questionnaire; QoL, quality of life; RIB, ribociclib; TTD, time to deterioration.
References: 1. Hurvitz SA, Lee SC, Jerusalem G, et al. Ribociclib (RIB) in patients (pts) with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC) and resistance to prior endocrine therapy (ET) in the MONALEESA (ML)-3 and -7 trials. Presented at: ESMO Virtual Congress 2020; Sept. 14-Oct. 18, 2020. 2. Fasching P, Bardia A, Nusch A, et al. Pooled analysis of patient (pt)-reported quality of life (QOL) in the MONALEESA (ML)-2, -3, and -7 trials of ribociclib (RIB) plus endocrine therapy (ET) to treat hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) [abstract]. ESMO Academy 2020 Virtual Meeting; August 21-22, 2020. 3. KISQALI [Summary of Product Characteristics]. Novartis Pharma AG; 2019. 4. Fasching P, Bardia A, Nusch A, et al.  Pooled analysis of patient-reported quality of life in the MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 trials of ribociclib plus endocrine therapy to treat hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Oral presentation presented at: ESMO Academy 2020 Virtual Meeting; August 21-22, 2020. 5. De Laurentiis M, de la Cruz-Merino L, Hart L, et al. Impact of ribociclib (RIB) dose reduction on overall survival in patients with HR+/HER2– advanced breast cancer (ABC) in MONALEESA (ML)-3 and -7 [abstract]. Presented at: ESMO Virtual Congress 2020; Sept. 14-Oct. 18, 2020.  6. De Laurentiis M, de la Cruz-Merino L, Hart L, et al. Impact of ribociclib dose reduction on overall survival in patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer in MONALEESA-3 and -7. Poster presented at: ESMO Virtual Congress 2020; Sept. 14-Oct. 18, 2020.  7. Fasching P, Delea TE, Lu Y-S, et al.  Comparative effectiveness of ribociclib plus fulvestrant (RIB+FUL) versus palbociclib plus letrozole (PAL+LET) as first-line (1L) treatment (Tx) of HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC) assessed by matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) [abstract]. Presented at: ESMO Virtual Congress 2020; Sept. 14-Oct. 18, 2020.  8. Fasching P, Delea TE, Lu Y-S, et al. Comparative effectiveness of ribociclib plus fulvestrant versus palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line treatment of HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer assessed by matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Poster presented at: ESMO Virtual Congress 2020; Sept. 14-Oct. 18, 2020.