For Healthcare Professionals Outside the US
KISQALI is indicated for the treatment of women with hormone receptor (HR)–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)—negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant as initial endocrine-based therapy, or in women who have received prior endocrine therapy. In pre‑ or perimenopausal women, the endocrine therapy should be combined with a luteinizing hormone‑releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist.

It looks like you are using an older version of Internet Explorer which is not supported. We advise that you update your browser to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, or consider using other browsers such as Chrome, Firefox or Safari.

Long-term follow-up: Ad hoc exploratory analysis with a median follow-up of 71 months

Over 5.5 years median overall survival for first-line postmenopausal patients with fulvestrant1,2

1140_Lightboxed_L02_M3_GLOBAL_OS_125_DKT_MOB_M3_1L_OS_desktop.png
Hazard ratios are based on stratified Cox model.

At a median follow-up of 39 months

Statistically significant improvement in overall survival in the ITT population:

  • mOS with KISQALI + fulvestrant not reached (95% CI: 42.5-NR) vs 40.0 months with placebo + fulvestrant (95% CI: 37.0-NR); P=0.00455 (HR=0.72 [95% CI: 0.57-0.92])3
  • mPFS was 20.5 months (95% CI: 18.5-23.5) with KISQALI + fulvestrant vs 12.8 months (95% CI: 10.9-16.3) with placebo + fulvestrant (HR=0.593 [95% CI: 0.480-0.732]; P<0.001)4,5

The first-line patient group comprised late-relapse (patients whose disease relapsed >12 months after completion of [neo]adjuvant ET with no subsequent treatment) and de novo (those with de novo disease and no prior ET) patients.1

Dennis Slamon, MD, PhD
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, CA
Dr Dennis Slamon summarizes the importance of the MONALEESA-3 results for first-line
patients and quality of life

Stephen Chia, MD, FRCPC
British Columbia Cancer Center
Vancouver, Canada
Watch Dr Stephen Chia discuss the significance of the overall survival results from MONALEESA-3 in a historically challenging-to-treat patient population

Patrick Neven, MD
University Hospitals Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg
Leuven, Belgium
Watch Dr Patrick Neven describe the robust and clinically significant impact of the MONALEESA-3 results

Stephen Chia, MD
British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver
Vancouver, Canada
See Dr Stephen Chia discuss how the updated MONALEESA-3 results bring optimism for first-line patients and clinicians

Peter Fasching, MD
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Erlangen, Germany
Dr Peter Fasching explains the significance
of the treatment benefit of combination
therapy in MONALEESA-3 for first-line patients

Michelino De Laurentiis, MD
National Cancer Institute
Naples, Italy
Dr Michelino De Laurentiis describes how MONALEESA-3 is unique in the landscape of CDK4/6 inhibitor trials and describes the unprecedented efficacy of the 71-month follow-up

AI, aromatase inhibitor; CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; CI, confidence interval; ET, endocrine therapy; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intent to treat; mOS, median overall survival; mPFS, median progression-free survival; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival.
References: 1. Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, et al. Ribociclib plus fulvestrant for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer in the phase III randomized MONALEESA-3 trial: updated overall survival. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(8):1015-1024. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.353 2. Data on file. Novartis Pharma AG. 3. Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, et al. Overall survival with ribociclib plus fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(6):514-524. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1911149 4. KISQALI [Summary of Product Characteristics]. Novartis Pharma AG; 2019. 5. Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, et al. Phase III randomized study of ribociclib and fulvestrant in hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative advanced breast cancer: MONALEESA-3. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(24):2465-2472. doi:10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9909